Legal Opinion
Lane v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 14, 2011No. 108,747PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANE P. WISEMAN, Judge.
11 Erik Lane, Sr. (Father), appeals from an order of the trial court upon jury verdict terminating his parental rights to his minor children, EPFL, Jr., HRSL, and JJL (the Children). Father raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer and finding that the State of Oklahoma met its burden to prove that active efforts had been made to prevent the breakup of this Indian family, and (2) whether the trial court erred by refusing to invoke the rule of sequestration.1 After reviewing the record and applicable law, we find…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- The People of the State of South Dakota in the Interest of J.S.B., Jr., Minor Child and Concerning J.S.B., Sr. and O.L.J.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Clark v. Continental Tank Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- People ex rel. K.D.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Black (In re V.D.)Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Simmers v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Smith v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- IN THE MATTER OF W.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022