Justice v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Special ground 1 of the amended motion complains of the following charge on consequential damages: “Now, here is how you must decide that. You will temporarily ignore that strip of land which is now missing from the Maddux and (Justice tract, because you have already to pay them for that. But look at the two tracts that are left on each side of that strip, and answer this question: Are those two tracts in the shape they are in, with the highway .there, are they worth more than they were before there was any highway there, are they worth more now than they were before there was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carmichael Tile Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- McArthur v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- State Highway Bd. of Georgia v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- G. Bernd Company v. RahnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Poppell v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981