McArthur v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
There are only two elements of damages to be considered in a condemnation proceeding: first, the market value of the property actually taken; second, the consequential damage that will naturally and proximately arise to the remainder of the owner’s property from the taking of the part which is taken and the devoting of it to the purposes for which it is condemned, including its proper maintenance and operation, and the measure of these consequential damages is the diminution in the market value of the remainder of the property proximately arising from these causes. Consequential damages to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central Georgia Power Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Atlanta Terra Cotta Co. v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- McCrea v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wright v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Simon v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Whipple v. County of HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.