Legal Opinion

Scannell v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Scannell)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 24, 2014No. Bankruptcy No. 08-18329-DPC; Adversary No. 13-302Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER SETTING PRIORITY OF LIENS

DANIEL P. COLLINS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The parties present an issue of first impression, namely, which has priority in Arizona: a restitution lien or a purchase money deed of trust? The Court concludes that a purchase money deed of trust against real property has priority over an earlier recorded restitution lien.

I. Facts

The essential facts are undisputed. They occurred prepetition.

On December 15, 2004, the Pima County Attorney’s Office1 filed a restitution lien in the original principal amount of $2,070,550 against the Debtor pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hughes v. JorgensonArizona Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API