Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. Burge
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. Ti-ie facts are stated in K. C. Ft. S. & G. Rid. Co. v. Bwge, decided at the session of the court in December, 1888, and in the opinion herein, filed at the session iu May, 1889.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This was a statutory action to recover the value of a colt killed by the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf *737Company in the operation of its railway. The principal question presented in this court was the sufficiency of the proof offered to show that the colt was killed in the county of Bourbon, where the action was brought and a negative decision was first given. A reexamination of the case, in which for the first time we are aided by a brief of defendant in error, convinces us that the testimony given and the facts which come within the range…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Prell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Hoyt v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- State v. RaglandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. SwanTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- State v. PackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.