Legal Opinion

Peterson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shumway Brothers were farmers engaged in the stock-raising business in Baker county, Oregon, who had not elected to conduct their business under what is usually known as the Workman’s Compensation Law. Neither they nor their employees had elected not to be subject to the act.

In April, 1931, they employed Clarence Peterson and three of his brothers for the sole purpose of felling timber, cutting it into 16-inch lengths and splitting it into suitable size for stovewood to be used on the farm of the employers.

The timber to be cut would scale from two feet to four feet at the base, and run about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Eclipse Mill Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Brazeale v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pierson v. General Plywood Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API