Legal Opinion
Eclipse Mill Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1926No. Nos. 20214, 20215. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
These are separate appeals, consolidated by an order of this court for the purpose of hearing. Each of the appellants employs workmen who work in extra-hazardous occupations as that term is defined in the state workmen’s compensation act. Certain of these -workmen the appellants did not list on their payrolls furnished the department of labor and industries, whose duty it is to enforce the provisions of the act mentioned. The department ordered them so to do, and threatened them with the penalties of the act, in the case they refused to comply with the order. Actions were then begun by each…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peterson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Motor Boat Sales, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Dewey Fish Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Garrisey v. Westshore Marina AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.