Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Janes

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2013No. Docket No. 312490Published

1DissentJansen, J.

In my opinion, the Michigan Legislature intended to make the criminal offense set forth in § 3(2) of the dangerous animals act, MCL 287.323(2), a strict-liability crime. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Section 3(2) of the dangerous animals act, MCL 287.323(2), provides:

If an animal that meets the definition of a dangerous animal in [MCL 287.321(a)] attacks a person and causes serious injury other than death, the owner of the animal is guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment for not more than 4 years, a fine of not less than $2,000.00, or community service work for not less than 500…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API