Waterloo Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Motion to dismiss a claim for roiling of water in connection with canal improvement.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This claim has been filed to recover damages claimed to have been suffered by claimant as the result of the roiling of the waters of Seneca outlet by the state and its contractors in the course of the work of improvement of the Cayuga and Seneca canals pursuant to the provisions of chapter 391 of the Laws of 1909.
Claimant, as its name indicates, is a manufacturer of woolen goods and owns a factory plant located on lands on and adjacent to the northerly bank of Seneca outlet at Waterloo, N. Y. In its manufacturing processes it uses a large amount of water, which, to be suitable for its use,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Noonan v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Alstyne v. Rochester Telephone Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- James Frazee Milling Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1924
- Industrial Distilling Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1922
- Waterloo Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1923