Legal Opinion · Dissent
Dondeneau v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1926Published
1Dissent
BUBNETT, J.,
Dissenting. — This case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, of which the following is a copy, omitting the signatures of counsel:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto by their respective attorneys:
“I.
“That plaintiff is a resident and inhabitant of the county of Multnomah in the'state of Oregon.
“II.
“That the defendant is the lawfully authorized agent of the state of Oregon for the administration of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state of Oregon.
“III.
“It is mutually stipulated and agreed that the plaintiff, R. Dondeneau, was'…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Carnes v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.