Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of Pharmacy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1965No. Calendar 32, Docket 50,087; Calendar 6, Docket 51,379Published

1ConcurrenceAdams, J.

Whether one agrees with the construction of the so-called grandfather provision of CL 1948, § 338.481 (Stat Ann 1956 Rev § 14.771) contended for by Justice Dethmers or by Justice O’Hara, the statute, in my opinion, is unconstitutional.

I

I agree with Justice Dethmers that the sale of drugs and poisons can very directly affect public health, safety and general welfare. Any reasonable exercise of the police power in this field must be upheld but the test of rationality still applies to the method of regulation employed by the legislature.

I am not unmindful of the strictures of the United States…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API