Legal Opinion
Adams v. Noble
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Kent; Adsit, J. Bill of interpleader by William M. Adams and George W. Hart against Albert D. Noble, Marj^ A. Kendall, and Abbie A. Weller, to determine the title to a fund arising from a party-wall agreement. From a decree for defendant Kendall, defendant Noble appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
In August, 1875, a contract was made between Peter Kantenberger and Gerret Brusse, with the following provisions:
“Whereas, the said Kantenberger is seised and possessed in fee of that certain piece of land, situate in said city, known and described as lot No. three (3) in block No. one (1) of the original Converse plat of a subdivision of said city, which plat is now vacated, and said Brusse is seised and possessed in fee of that other piece of land adjoining and lying along the westerly side of said first parcel, and being lot No. four (4) of said block No. one (l) of said vacated plat, said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Maine v. CumstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Gibson v. HoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- King v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Bloch v. IshamIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greenspan v. RehbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hoffman v. DicksonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Rugg v. LemleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Fair Building Co. v. Wineman Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Ellensburg Lodge No. 20 v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.