Legal Opinion

Lee v. Dattilo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 6, 1988No. 87-633 & 87-836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

A purchase and sale agreement drawn by a broker on a Greater Boston Real Estate Board form for a residence in Winchester contained a number of commonplace provisions: the deed shall convey a good and clear record and marketable title; buyer shall be entitled to an inspection of premises prior to delivery of the deed; and time is of the essence. The present dispute arose because the broker, the seller’s agent, selected 4:00 p.m. as the time for the closing at the Middlesex South District Registry of Deeds on October 6, 1983. The parties met at the registry, the seller arriving “shortly after”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Limpus v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  2. O'Meara v. GleasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Coons v. CarstensenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Cassidy v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Nesco Aluminum Sales v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gloucester Landing Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Gloucester Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Auclair v. ThomasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Bailey v. Seacoast Financial Services Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API