Legal Opinion
Clark v. Barkley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 22, 2002No. Docket No. 00-2695PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Petitioner Manuel Clark appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (John Gleeson, Judge) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), on the ground that the petition was time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), the statute of limitations provision imposed by the An-titerrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Anthony Ross v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tony Bruce Bennett v. Christopher Artuz, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Qabail Hizbullahankhamon v. Hans Walker, the Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clemente v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Davis v. FaucherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020