Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 21, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00636Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI MARK DANIELS, Petitioner, : Case No. 1:21-cv-636 - vs - District Judge Susan J. Dlott Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, Noble Correctional Institution, : Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION This habeas corpus action, brought pro se by Petitioner Mark Daniels under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 18). Daniels seeks reconsideration of Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Litkovitz’s Order (ECF No. 17) denying…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API