Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1932No. 28195Published

1DissentPaine, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case. To go back to the old custom of each district judge appointing independent receivers in each county for failed banks will, in my opinion, defeat the whole plan worked out so carefully by the legislature.

From the first, our guaranty plan has been approved by the United States supreme court. In deciding the case of Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U. S. 104, 55 L. Ed. 112, and its companion case of Shallenberger v. First State *116Bank, 219 U. S. 114, Justice Holmes said: “If then the legislature of the state thinks that the public welfare…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Abie State Bank v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. WeitzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Schallenberger v. First State Bank of HolsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API