Legal Opinion

Hartman Coal Co. v. William J. Howe Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 23, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.

This is an action for damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff by reason of the defendant’s refusal to accept two cars of coal ordered under a written contract.

The defendant pleads as a defense a cancellation of the contract on the ground of_late delivery. Defendant also pleads a counterclaim based upon failure to deliver the coal by which defendant lost the profits on a resale to another dealer. The written instrument upon which plaintiff’s case is based is dated January 28, 1926, and purports to show the terms upon which the coal was to be sold by plaintiff and bought by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pope v. Terre Haute Car & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. John F. Trainor Co. v. G. Amsinck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. A. B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Joseph v. SulzbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Goodyear v. H. J. Koehler Sporting Goods Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API