Legal Opinion
A. B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff has recovered a judgment for the agreed price of certain tubes. The findings establish that by contract made on the 17th day of April, 1920, the plaintiff’s assignor had agreed to have specially cut for, and to sell and deliver to, the defendant certain steel boiler tubes. No time for delivery was expressly fixed in the contract. Delivery of one item of steel boiler tubes included in this contract was made on November 1st, 1920. This item is not included in the tubes for which the plaintiff now seeks payment. No delivery of those tubes or offer to deliver was made until March…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Pope v. Terre Haute Car & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- John F. Trainor Co. v. G. Amsinck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zev v. MermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Goodman v. Del-Sa-Co Foods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Van Iderstine Co., Inc. v. Barnet L. Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- 76 North Associates v. Theil Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.