Legal Opinion

MHC Investment Co. v. Racom Corp.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided July 26, 2002No. 4-01-CV-90708PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PRATT, District Judge.

Plaintiff, MHC Investment Company (“MHC”), filed this action for judgment on a series of agreements between itself and Defendant Racom Corporation (“Racom”). Ra-com has pled affirmative defenses of fraudulent inducement, lack of authority on the part of Racom’s board of directors to enter the agreement, and lack of consideration. Racom has also brought counterclaims against MHC and the individual third-party defendants for fraud, civil RICO, slander per se, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff MHC moved for summary judgment on its original…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Commercial Property Investments, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Quality Inns International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Carol J. Pope, Gwen G. Caranchini v. Federal Express Corporation Danny R. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Jacqueline Stanback v. Best Diversified Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Gerald L. ALLEN, Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MRU Holdings Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API