Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bank of the State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The Bank of the State of Indiana, for the Lawrenceburgh Branch, sued Smith, Stevenson, and Bradley, on bills of exchange.

The defendants answered:

1. Denying that the Board of Directors of the bank was legally constituted in this; that one of said directors, who was also president of the board, was ineligible to the office.

2. That the bank had not taken out brokers’ license.

3. Usury.

4. That the bills were not discounted by a quorum of the directors of the branch bank, pursuant to the requirements of the charter.

The Court sustained demurrers to the 1st, 2d, and 4th defences, and issue of fact…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Covington, Coal-Creek, & Jacksonville Plank-Road Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Billingsley v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bradley v. Bank of the StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Bank of the State v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API