Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Forrestier

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 2013No. 12-1391PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

11 The plaintiff, an insurance company, filed suit as subrogee of its insured in order to enforce its subrogation rights. Thereafter, the insured and her husband intervened. The intervenors sought damages for the insured’s personal injuries and for property damage and for her husband’s loss of consortium. The defendants filed exceptions of prescription and no right of action, which were granted by the trial court. The intervenors appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

The plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., filed this action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  2. Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NOSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Bailey v. KhourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  5. Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, Division of HospitalsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Olympia Minerals, LLC v. H. S. Resources, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API