Legal Opinion

Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 8, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 76-501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board), 186 USPQ 301 (1975), dismissing appellant’s (Broderick’s) opposition No. 53,629, filed October 30, 1972, against appellee’s (Goodyear’s) application serial No. 400,726, filed August 20, 1971, for registration of POWERSTEEL for tires, use since June 23, 1971 being alleged. We reverse.

Broderick relies on its long and extensive use of POWERSTEEL * in connection with wire cables and ropes, the purchase by heavy equipment operators of steel cable and tires, the fact…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Shoe Corporation v. Lerner Bros. Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc. v. R. A. Products IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. CTS Corp. v. Cronstoms Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. Crown Radio Corp. v. Soundscriber Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Octocom Systems, Inc. v. Houston Computer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. S Industries, Inc. v. Stone Age Equipment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  3. Nike, Inc. v. WNBA Enterprises, LLC, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2007
  4. Nike, Inc. v. WNBA Enterprises, LLC, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API