Legal Opinion

Sosa v. Central Power & Light

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1995No. 95-0834PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the construction of Rule 63 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The question is whether Rule 4 governs the computation of the time period in Rule 63. Rule 63 provides that an amended pleading requires leave of court if it is filed within seven days of trial. Because we conclude Rule 4 does govern, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Tex.R.App.P. 170.

Lydia Sosa and her children sued Central Power & Light, Houston Lighting & Power Company, and General Electric for the wrongful death of Lydia’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Drake Insurance Co. v. Tommy Paul KingTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Volvo Petroleum, Inc. v. Getty Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Dillingham v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Oehler v. OehlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Haynes v. City of Beaumont, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Fletcher v. Edwards, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  3. Esty v. Beal Bank S.S.B., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Melendez v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Torres v. GSC Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API