Legal Opinion · Dissent

Knauer v. Foote

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2003No. 22916Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion of

ACOBA, J.

The germane question decided on appeal is whether the circuit court (the court) had jurisdiction to order expungement of the lis pendens that was filed in this ease. I do not agree with the majority’s holding that: (1) the court had jurisdiction to order expungement of the lis pendens from the land court registration system; and (2) the majority’s analysis that (a) TSA Int’l Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp., 92 Hawai'i 243, 990 P.2d 713 (1999) and Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 501-151 (1993) and 501-152 (1993) support its holding, see majority opinion at 88, 63 P.3d at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Land Title, Bishop TrustHawaii Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tamashiro v. Control Specialist, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. GGS (HI), Inc. v. New York Diamond, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API