Huls v. Huls

PEDEN, Justice.

Rose Marie Huls appeals only from those portions of a “no fault” divorce decree that divide the property of the parties and fix the amount Mr. Huls is to pay for child support.

After a non-jury trial, the judge made findings of fact. His ninth finding included a statement that the parties had accumulated the following property during the marriage:

a) A family business, Fruit Gifts of Houston, Inc., found to have a value of $85,000.

b) A homestead valued at $118,000.

c) Furniture and furnishings valued at $8,509.20.

d) A 1975 Stationwagon valued at $750.

e) Cash on hand of $1,049.37.

f)…