King v. King

OPINION

JACK SMITH, Justice.

This is a divorce case in which the appellant wife alleges that the trial court erred in the characterization and division of property. Her basic contention is that the trial court erred in characterizing and awarding 155 shares of stock to the appellee as his separate property. She asserts that because of this error the trial court’s judgment resulted in a manifestly unjust and inequitable division of property.

The 155 shares of Southern California Chemical Corp. stock, which Mrs. King states should not have been awarded to Mr. Ed King as his separate property, was…