Legal Opinion

State v. Nordstrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1893No. 876PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Emg County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

Again the question is presented here, that the appellant, under the federal constitution, is entitled to have the charge against him presented upon an indictment found by a grand jury. In this instance the contention is based upon the language of the enabling act, which provided that the constitution of Washington should be republican in form, and “not repugnant to the constitution of the United States.”

*508Much learned investigation and ingenious argument have been expended by counsel in an endeavor to impress this court with the view that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. Ah ChueyNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  4. State v. FreidrichWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Dodd v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HeightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Thornton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API