Legal Opinion

Buttram v. Jones

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1943No. Civ. 991PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

BROADDUS, District Judge.

At the pretrial conference certain allegations in plaintiff’s petition were admitted, and they are as follows:

1. Plaintiff is a resident and citizen of Oklahoma, and defendant, H. C. Jones, at all times material to this action, was the Collector of Internal Revenue for the United States in Oklahoma.

2. Plaintiff was the owner of certain real property upon which he had planted, maintained and cared for, certain trees, shrubs and other plantings.

3. Within the time allowed by law, plaintiff filed his income tax return for the year…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Helvering v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Matheson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Grant v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kemper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Knapp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  3. Broido v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. Burns v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  5. Graham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API