Legal Opinion

State v. Enriquez-Beltran

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2000No. A-99-1242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sievers, Judge.

State v. Franco, 257 Neb. 15, 594 N.W.2d 633 (1999), holds that generally, the Double Jeopardy Clause prevents both property or money forfeiture proceedings and criminal charges against a defendant arising from the same incident. In this appeal, we determine whether Franco extends to a case where a forfeiture is followed by a criminal conviction which results from a guilty plea.

BACKGROUND

The conviction and forfeiture action at issue in this case stem from the arrest of Samuel Enriquez-Beltran on drug-related charges. On July 28, 1997, the State of Nebraska filed a “Complaint…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kelly v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. LindsayNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. StartNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API