Storing v. Stutsman
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChristian son, J.
The defendant moved “to quash the garnishment-affidavit and the disclosure of A. D. Gaines, as garnishee” on the-grounds that the affidavit for garnishment is not sufficient in this: that it fails to state that the affiant “verily” believes the garnishee has property belonging to the defendant; that the garnishment affidavit is indefinite and uncertain as to which of the two garnishees it refers; that' the affidavit and garnishee summons were not filed with the clerk within ten days after service thereof; that the affidavit of Gaines admitting liability was not made within thirty days after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Atherton v. CorlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Levert v. ReadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Park, Grant, & Morris v. NordaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Bellion v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Young v. WaldropMontana Supreme Court · 1941