Legal Opinion

Storing v. Stutsman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristian son, J.

The defendant moved “to quash the garnishment-affidavit and the disclosure of A. D. Gaines, as garnishee” on the-grounds that the affidavit for garnishment is not sufficient in this: that it fails to state that the affiant “verily” believes the garnishee has property belonging to the defendant; that the garnishment affidavit is indefinite and uncertain as to which of the two garnishees it refers; that' the affidavit and garnishee summons were not filed with the clerk within ten days after service thereof; that the affidavit of Gaines admitting liability was not made within thirty days after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Atherton v. CorlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Levert v. ReadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Park, Grant, & Morris v. NordaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bellion v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Young v. WaldropMontana Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API