Legal Opinion

Dandyline Co. v. Linsk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1922No. Gen. No. 24,582PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

On October 7, 1922, the Dandyline Company filed in this court the mandate of the Supreme Court of this State and moved to have the cause reinstated and re-docketed and for the entry of final judgment in accordance with the directions in the remanding order.

The mandate of the Supreme Court — Dandyline Co. v. Linsk, 295 Ill. 69 [reversing 216 Ill. App. 479] — is that the cause be remanded to this court “with directions to enter such judgment reversing and remanding or affirming the judgment of the municipal court as in its judgment may be proper, or reciting in its judgment the facts found by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conner v. Borland-Grannis Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Reynolds v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Dandyline Co. v. LinskIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Dandyline Co. v. LinskAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API