Legal Opinion
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Rand, No. Cv95-76644 (Apr. 4, 1996)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 4, 1996No. CV95-76644UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#103) On September 18, 1995, the plaintiff, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. (Middlesex Mutual), filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment regarding its obligation to defend and indemnify the defendant, Samuel Rand, in a separate civil action arising out of the defendant's alleged sexual abuse of a minor child. For the reasons stated herein, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted.
According to the complaint, Middlesex Mutual had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- LaBonte v. Federal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000