Legal Opinion

In re Colwart

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 6, 1998No. 98-B-2303PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

liPER CURIAM.*

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael C. Col-wart. The charges allege respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically, Rules 1.3 (lack of due diligence), 1.4 (failing to comply with reasonable requests for information), 1.5 (failing to refund fee), 1.15(b) (failing to return and account for client funds), 8.1(b) (knowing failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. In re CrawfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re FazandeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. In re GrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. In re SlaughterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In re HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. In re KeeleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API