Beatty v. Legge
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BRANDON J. BEATTY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. JES-24-1188 ) KATHERINE LEGGE, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND OPINION Plaintiff Brandon J. Beatty, a non-prisoner, has filed a pro se Complaint under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
(Doc. 1), a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc. 2), and a motion for recruitment of counsel. Doc. 3. For the reasons set forth below, the IFP motion is DENIED for failure to state a claim. Consequently, Plaintiff’s remaining motions are denied as moot, and his Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.