Legal Opinion

Vaksman v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeal, No. 147PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

Plaintiffs brought this action of assumpsit to re-, cover on a policy of automobile insurance issued to them by defendant. The action was commenced by filing a complaint and, after defendant had made answer thereto, plaintiff filed a pleading styled a “demurrer” which the court below and the parties treated as a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Judgment was entered in favor .of plaintiffs on these pleadings and the defendant has appealed to this Court.

The averments of fact in the complaint may be summarized as follows: The defendant issued to plaintiffs a policy of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Renschler v. PizanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Kraftsow v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Hamilton v. American Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Fullmer v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Moffat v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Greenway Center, Inc. v. Essex Insurance Company, Annette Maione, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Mark WilletCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API