Legal Opinion
Furumoto v. Lyman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 21, 1973No. C-72-1997-CBRPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER AND JUDGMENT
RENFREW, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, former students at Stanford University, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and the First, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments. They invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under 28 U.S. C. §§ 1331 and 1343. Defendants are members of the Board of Trustees, administration and faculty of Stanford University. The claims arose from plaintiffs’ participation in a disturbance in a classroom at Stanford, for which they were given indefinite suspensions from…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- James H. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Company, International Brotherhood of Electricalworkers, Local 605 Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State v. SchmidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Braden v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Cohen v. Illinois Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Rackin v. University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.