State v. Stone
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Both of these appeals arise out of extradition demands under the Uniform Criminal Ex tradition Act, sec. 976.03, Stats. The State of Michigan sought the return of Stone to answer to charges of drug law violations, and the State of Ohio sought the return of Corley, who allegedly escaped from confinement there. Both were taken into custody in Wisconsin pursuant to warrants issued by the governor of Wisconsin following extradition demands made by the governors of Michigan and Ohio.
Both Stone and Corley sought to test the warrant issued in the demanding state in separate Wisconsin habeas corpus…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Sieloff v. GolzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Reddin v. MeekmaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ehlers v. EndicottCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Lykins v. SteinhorstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Crew v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Rodencal v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991