Legal Opinion
Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 23, 1952No. 50 C 1362PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiffs, seeking an injunction, damages, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees, charge the defendants with infringement of claims 7 and 10 of the Kenneth S. Rogers Patent No. 2,108,727, which was issued on February IS, 1938. The defendants deny infringement and the validity of the claims alleged to be infringed.
The plaintiff, Artmoore Company, is a corporation of' Wisconsin, having its principal place of business at Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The plaintiff, Niles Metalcraft Company, is a copartnership doing business at Niles, Michigan, the partners therein…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Trico Products Corporation v. Delman CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1961