Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Foley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1912No. Docket No. 41Published

Error to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Case by Ella M. Stanton against Bart Foley and another for unlawful sales of intoxicating liquors to plain-Plaintiff tiff’s husband. Judgment for defendants, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case, under the statute, in which the plaintiff, a married woman, seeks to recover damages against Bart Foley, a saloon keeper, and the Michigan Bonding Company, his surety, for the selling, giving, and furnishing of spirituous and intoxicating liquors to her husband, by said Foley, between the 1st day of May, 1909, and the 1st day of May, 1910; the plaintiff claiming that her husband was then a person in the habit of getting intoxicated, and that whisky and beer were sold, furnished, given, and delivered by said Foley personally, in his saloon and in other places,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lorf v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Goldsmith v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API