Legal Opinion

United States v. International Reinsurance Corp.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1936No. 11367PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Presiding Justice.

The court did not err in rendering the judgment excepted to. The right of the plaintiff in error to maintain its claim and recover thereon depended upon the question whether the contract between Public Indemnity Company and International Reinsurance Corporation was valid, or was invalid on the ground of fraud. Although the parties to this case are very numerous, and the record is very long, and the documents numerous and lengthy, there is nothing in the record to show that the contract referred to was invalid for the reasons alleged. The court properly rendered the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Withers v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API