Legal Opinion

Cook v. Miller Transport Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1935No. Appeals, 313 and 314PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Defendant appeals from the judgments entered on two verdicts of $8,500 and $3,000 respectively, the first in favor of Harry J. Cook, the minor who was injured, and the second in favor of Harry L. Cook and Meta Cook, his parents, who were also his next friends. The record is free from error and the judgments must, therefore, be affirmed.

As shown by the statement of the questions involved, to which the appeal is necessarily limited (Keller v. N. J. Fidelity & Plate Glass Ins. Co., 306 Pa. 124), but two questions are presented for our consideration: (1) Was there sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Keller v. N. J. Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Griffith v. v. A. Simrell & Son Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Prinz v. LucasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Mulheirn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Kotlikoff v. Master, Admrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Maselli v. StephensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Campbell v. FiorotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API