Legal Opinion

Beaupre v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2007No. 79976-8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570¶1 Pierce County appeals a trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. Pierce County contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling that the professional rescue doctrine does not bar Sergeant Curtis Beaupre’s suit against Pierce County for injuries sustained when a fellow Pierce County sheriff’s officer struck him with a patrol car during a hot pursuit. We hold as a matter of law that the professional rescue doctrine does not bar Beaupre’s suit against his employer. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

Owens, J.

FACTS

¶2…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Maltman v. SauerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Valerie J. SlotkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Spradlin Rock Products, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. SPRADLIN ROCK v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API