Legal Opinion

State v. Poole

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2012No. SD 31403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL, Presiding Judge.

Jerome George Poole (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction following a jury trial of distribution of cocaine base, a controlled substance. See section 195.211.1 In a sin*680gle point relied on, Defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence that he refused to provide a court-ordered voice sample to law enforcement. Defendant argues that his refusal to provide the sample “was far more prejudicial than probative of his guilt of the charged offense” because the State could have instead used existing recordings of his voice. Finding no merit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. State v. DiercksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. EdbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. ChapmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ErvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API