Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Morgan

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 23, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The defendants resist the bill, first, be-

cause they contend that the payments directed to be made to the widow under the fourth item of the will were not intended by the testator to be charged on the land devised to the sons, and second, because they contend the widow has formally released all her claims.

First. That legacies are chargeable on the personal estate is, of course, well settled. That they may however be charged upon the real estate when an intention so to charge them is either expressly, or by clear implication manifest from the will, is equally well established.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rambo v. RumerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
  2. White v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Hilford v. WayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1830
  4. Montgomery v. M'ElroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  5. Getchell v. RustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Security Trust Co. v. CoolingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
  2. Security Trust Co. v. BulcroftCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  3. University of Delaware v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API