Connell v. El Paso Gold Mining & Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The defendant Connell, who was the record owner of the Gibraltar lode mining claim, sold and conveyed it to the plaintiff gold mining company for the sum of three thousand dollars. After the sale was thus executed, the plaintiff, learning that the purported discovery shaft of the claim was not within its exterior boundaries, but on a previously patented location, tendered to defendant a reconveyance of the property and demanded the return of the purchase money, which the defendant refused to refund. Thereupon plaintiff brought this action *32charging that defendant falsely and fraudulently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Belknap v. . SealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Sellar v. ClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
- Wheeler v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Lahay v. City National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Givens v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Otis & Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- H. B. Bolas Enterprises, Inc. v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- American Bonding & Trust Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Kilpatrick v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Drovers' State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.