Legal Opinion

Polansky v. McCoole

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 20, 2016No. 13-cv-458-JLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Christopher Polansky v. Civil No. 13-cv-458-JL Opinion No.

2016 DNH 012

Ann Marie McCoole MEMORANDUM ORDER This civil rights action turns squarely on the requirement of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), see 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), that an inmate exhaust the Department of Corrections’s formal grievance process prior to seeking recovery under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

in federal court. By his Amended Complaint, the plaintiff, Christopher Polansky, seeks to recover for damages he allegedly suffered as a result of inadequate medical care during a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API