Legal Opinion

Kind v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1979No. 4990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is concerned with the nature of the evidence a defendant in a criminal proceeding must present in order to require the issue of mental illness or deficiency to be decided by *961the jury. A second issue which we will resolve is, assuming that some such evidence is produced, can the State of Wyoming then rely upon the presumption of sanity in order to avoid a judgment of acquittal? In this case the district court refused to submit the issue of mental illness or deficiency to the jury. We find that the defendant did introduce sufficient evidence to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. CochranIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Reilly v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Rice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chestnut v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. State v. MilamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brooks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Solomon Preston Bolen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Kind v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API