Nesbitt v. Nesbitt
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.
This is a motion by the Aro Corporation for an order vacating the third-party subpoena served upon it by service on the Secretary of State of the State of New York.
The litigation is matrimonial in nature and the plaintiff wife is in search of funds belonging to defendant husband. It appears that the latter, a judgment debtor, is either an employee, officer, or stockholder of the Aro Corporation.
The subpoena duces tecum for examination of a third party issued by wife is directed to the Aro Corporation and commands that it produce at a certain examination ‘1 all employment contracts and payroll…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Meyer v. . Consolidated Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Meyer v. Consolidated Ice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Matter of National City Bank v. DeszNew York Court of Appeals · 1939