Legal Opinion

Turner v. Hatchett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1991No. 9117SC3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

During oral argument on appeal Mr. Smith’s counsel raised the question of lack of jurisdiction and argued that the trial court’s order should be vacated because the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review of the record, we agree.

“Whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (emphasis added). “And objection to such jurisdiction may be made at any time during the progress of the action.” Baker v. Varser, 239 N.C. 180,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. . HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Capital Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Graham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Capital Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. VANCE CONST. CO., INC. v. Duane White Land Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Out of the Box Developers, LLC v. Logicbit Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API