Jamar v. Brightwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The parties hereto appear in' the same order in which they appeared in the trial court. They will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant.
The unquestioned facts as disclosed by the record are that the defendant furnished his minor son with an automobile to be used in going to and returning from school at Blanchard, Okla.; that on the 8th day of April, 1920, the son attended a ball game between the' Blanchard and Newcastle schools at a place some seven or eight miles north of Blanchard; that while returning to his home and while at a point some one and three-quarters miles from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hays v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- McNeal v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- McFarlane v. WintersUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Spence v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Barger v. MizelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Allen v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Gordon v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Randolph v. SchuthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.